As I said in my last post, “Kind of Blue”, improvisational speaking is generally not as freeform as it seems. Even the most unplanned response requires a certain amount of structuring, if it is to make sense to the audience.

One common impromptu speaking technique that many experts recommend is the PREP method. That’s where you structure your talk by beginning with your Position (opinion), followed by a Reason and then an Example, before ending by restating your Position.

PREP is the mnemonic device meant to help the speaker remember what to say next. It’s a clean, classic, simple structure that is easy to use on the fly, but I don’t like it.

First of all, it is only appropriate for stating an opinion. That’s a common speaking situation, but far from the only case in which we are ever called upon to speak. Often, it is much more appropriate to give a general summary of events, an encouraging pat on the back, a swift kick in the ass, an illuminating analogy, a helpful tip or some other type of response. I’ve seen far too many speakers try to shoehorn a non-opinion statement into an ill-fitting PREP form.

The far more fundamental problem with the PREP structured response is that it is static. It has no arc. It is a fixed and inflexible opinion, and it does nothing to bring the listener along to reaching that opinion. Nobody likes having conclusions shoved down their throat. That’s partly why our political debates have become so ugly and contentious, and so ineffective at persuading anyone to change their views.

There is a principle in sales that you have to begin where your prospect is, meaning you first have to show that you understand, appreciate and respect the prospect’s view of the situation. Only then will he or she be willing to come along with you to another way of looking at it.

That’s what a change arc does for you. It not only shows that you respect your audience’s opinions, it also gives them an investment in yours, because they feel like they have participated in its creation.

It brings your listeners along for the journey. Once you’ve got them in the car, it’s up to you to take them someplace they want to go.

{ 1 comment }

Kind of Blue

by R. L. Howser on April 17, 2010 · 2 comments

The best-selling jazz album of all time, Miles Davis’s, “Kind of Blue” is billed as an improvisation. I think most people take that to mean that the musicians came into the studio and just started playing. While it’s true they had no written music to follow, that doesn’t mean they didn’t have a plan.

Before the session started, Davis had sketched out some basic structures and scales that he wanted them to work with. Having the backbone of the piece in place then freed them to play within that structure.

Impromptu speaking is a lot like that. While there are times when I’m forced to just make it up as I go along, that’s not usually the case. Usually, even in an unplanned speaking opportunity, I’ll have a few minutes, or at least a few seconds, to slap together a quick structure in my mind.

What I’m looking for is some kind of arc.

A story arc, in the case of a novel or movie, is how a character or situation changes during the course of the drama. In a speech, it can be that, or an arc from one idea to another, a progression of ideas that lead to a conclusion or any kind of change. The key is that we end up somewhere different from where we started.

Once we’ve identified where we want to start and where we want to go, the change we want to traverse, then it’s usually fairly simple to speak extemporaneously, without sounding like an idiot..………..  Usually.

{ 2 comments }

After writing my last post, Got any change?, it occurred to me that there are some cases in which we don’t really want to change our listeners at all. Sometimes we give a presentation not to challenge our audience’s perspectives or opinions, but rather to reinforce them, to reassure the audience that they are already right.

Preaching to the choir, as it’s often called, is quite common in politics. Whether it’s a politician pandering for support, or a political advocate firing up the troops, the goal is to hit the usual hot buttons, to tell them exactly what they want and expect to hear.

Reassuring speeches, such as a business leader would make during times of corporate unrest or a eulogy at a funeral, are also times not to be challenging the conventional wisdom or speaking truth to power. Your Uncle Marvin may have been a bit of a bastard, but that’s really not what people want to hear about as they stand around his open grave, even if it’s what they are all thinking.

The pep talk to the new recruits, the retirement party salute and all of the other pro forma talks we give are meant not to affect a change, but to follow form. They are comforting social rituals.

It all comes back to knowing the purpose of your speech or presentation. Staying within the confines of the expected can be a bit of a bore, but sometimes your purpose is to soothe, not to stir things up.

{ 0 comments }

Got any change?

by R. L. Howser on April 5, 2010 · 1 comment

Most speeches and presentations are a pleasant snooze, and that includes far too many of mine, I’m sorry to say. They might be very clearly structured, well written and professionally delivered, but they have no real lasting impact on the audience. And if they don’t affect the audience, what’s the point? Why did we waste our time and theirs?

Of course, if we want to have an impact, we need to first decide what we are trying to accomplish. This is something I harp on constantly. I don’t think I can say it enough, because it’s so fundamental to the process of effective speaking. But beyond that, once we know what we want to do, how can we make it happen?

To have an effect means that something has to change. The listeners’ perspectives, opinions, beliefs or understandings have to change. That change can happen instantly, or evolve slowly over time. It can be a coolly rational choice or an emotional impulse. But no matter how it happens, no change means no effect.

When you look at speeches and presentations that way, it can have a profound effect on how you prepare. Presenting information is no longer enough, you have to have a plan for how that information is going to impact the listeners. You have to know not only where you want the audience to go, but where they are to begin with and how you are going move them. It’s a far more daunting challenge, but a necessary one, if you want to be effective.

{ 1 comment }

Slow down

by R. L. Howser on March 28, 2010 · 0 comments

Most people find it nerve-wracking, to say the least, to stand in front of a crowd and speak. They just want to get it over with. So they barrel through their presentation at ninety miles an hour, like wind-up monkeys banging their cymbals, trying to make their case on sheer energy. When I work with clients like that, I have to tell them to do the hardest thing possible. I tell them to slow down. Slow down.

I don’t just mean that they should speak more slowly. That would be a big first step in fixing the problem, but we could get the same effect with a valium and a few shots of whiskey. It might make the experience far less stressful for them, but it certainly wouldn’t make them compelling speakers.

No, by slow down, I mean slow down mentally. Calm down, but even more than that, slow down and think about what you are saying. Think about what it means and then put that meaning into your words, into the rhythm and tone of your voice. Pause, first to give them a chance to anticipate what you are about to say, and then to digest it.

Not only do you give them, and yourself, a chance to breathe, but you put more power into your presentation. You make yourself sound more confident and thoughtful and your words and ideas seem all that much more profound. It’s both the easiest advice in the world to give, and some of the hardest to actually take.

But it works.

{ 0 comments }

There is a constant debate among speaking professionals about how much of a presentation should be planned and written and how much should emerge spontaneously from the speaker. As with most polarizing arguments, the answer is generally that the best practices come from a blending of the two approaches.

Few of us are good enough to build a coherent, clearly structured, strategically sound presentation without taking the time to consider our purpose, marshal convincing arguments and brainstorm different approaches. Often, it takes me hours of writing and deleting to even find the central message that I’m trying to communicate. Having a script keeps me on track to deliver that message.

Yet, for as comforting as it is to know what you are planning to say, focusing on the words, rather than the people in front of you, tends to inspire a rather robotic, detached quality in the speaker. The essence of compelling speaking is to direct your energy out to the audience, not at a paper or screen or inward to your own mind.

An entirely spontaneous presentation is usually fresher and more immediate. It allows the speaker to focus on the audience, to respond to how they react and to adjust course on the fly. It also lets the speaker nurture an intimate audience rapport that a pre-scripted speech simply can’t achieve.

Spontaneous speeches are also infamous for the, “I should have said” moments that generally follow.  Though I often get some of my best ideas in the heat of the moment on stage, I’m rarely able to express them in their most concise and coherent form without some time to ponder and massage them. Our minds sometimes work in intuitive leaps and tangents, but that’s something the audience will rarely be able to follow in its raw, unfiltered form.

Deliberate consideration leads to a well-reasoned, persuasively logical flow of information and the immediacy of spontaneous insight and expression gives it the spark to inspire, so plan carefully what you want to say, but then express yourself freely.

Put more simply, don’t worry about the words you use. Remember what you want to say.

{ 0 comments }

Make it sparkle

by R. L. Howser on March 15, 2010 · 0 comments

Have you ever taken a good look at the lighting in a jewelry store? Most of us don’t pay much attention to things like that, but jewelers do. They know that the best way to sell sparkly things is to emphasize the sparkle, the sizzle as it were, rather than the steak of prudent financial investment, so they install dozens of little pinpoint lights in the ceiling over the display cases. The stones, especially diamonds, reflect and refract the points of light back to the eye, and “voila”, they sparkle.

Speeches need to sparkle too. They need to be filled with small points that catch the ear and engage the mind and the imagination. Give your audience a crisp description that captures the essence of a person or place with one perfect adjective. Surprise them with twist on an idiom that sets them leaning one way, just before it whips them in another. Drop in a well timed pause that leaves a key word hanging in the air to be pondered.

The iron girders and bolts of fact and logic certainly have their place in the structure of your speech. They provide the strength and stability that hold the whole thing together. Emotion and enthusiasm provide the energy and resonance that will motivate change. But it’s the incandescent flashes of originality and insight that the logic supports that will really make the speech come alive for your audience.

{ 0 comments }

Make it sing

by R. L. Howser on March 10, 2010 · 0 comments

Most speeches plod. All of the parts are there, tied together competently, and yet the end result has all the verve and vitality of a Clydesdale pulling a heavy wagon. They get the job done, but that’s about it. Most speakers plod too, but that’s a point for another time.

What is it that makes a speaking script come alive? It’s not a big vocabulary. In fact, that is often a part of the problem. Nor is it any of the other skills you learned, or more often, failed to learn in high school English class. Good writing comes from three things; clear thinking, linguistic flexibility and an ear for the music.

Clear thinking means knowing what exactly you are trying to say. That sounds easy, but it is deceptively difficult to do. In fact, most of us use our language abilities far more often to hide our lack of clear thinking than we do to explain what we mean. Elegant simplicity in thought or language is a rare commodity.

Linguistic flexibility is the ability to take a clear thought and mentally work through the many different ways of expressing it, fitting the pieces together like a verbal jigsaw puzzle until the entire train of thought clicks into a cohesive and coherent whole. It’s what a visual artist does with an image or a musician with a string of sounds; spin and twist it in their minds, until the parts fit together just right.

As for the music, that one I can’t explain, any more than I can explain the genius of Mozart, Frank Sinatra or Elton John. The world is full of skilled musicians, but it’s the ear for the music that makes a skilled musician transcendent.

Some writers have that same ear for the music of language. Most of us don’t. Yet we can still aspire to the first two, and that’s enough to make us more competent than the vast majority of people who put pen to paper.

{ 0 comments }

“If you call attention to yourself at the expense of the song, that’s the cardinal sin.”

– Benmont Tench, keyboardist of Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers

I often tell my students and clients that they have to be the stars of their presentations. Their PowerPoint slides and handouts can’t carry the show. They have to step up and be the focal point of the audience’s attention. Many of them misunderstand this, at first, to mean that the presentation has to be all about them, as if it’s a talent contest. But that’s not what I mean at all.

Many musicians make the same mistake. They think that being a musical star is about vocal pyrotechnics, blazing speed on their instrument or striking rock star poses both on and off stage. Yet the musicians we remember, and whose music endures through time, are rarely the ones with the most spectacular technical chops. Billy Holiday, Bob Marley and the Beatles were all brilliantly talented, but their music isn’t technically difficult to play or musically complicated. Yet it’s still as fresh and vibrant twenty, thirty or even fifty later as it was the first time they played it, because they put their skills in the service of the song.

That’s what Benmont Tench was talking about. Each of the members of his band was an extraordinarily talented musician, but it was the music that came first, not showing off with fancy solos.

It’s the same with presentation. Many of the skills we learn, such as speaking in a loud, clear voice, using body language to present a confident image, structuring our words to catch and hold the attention of the audience and build suspense, can be used simply to draw attention to the speaker – to show off. But effective speakers put those skills in the service of the message. They use them to focus attention on the ideas that they are trying to plant in the listeners’ brains. That’s what separates effective speakers and presenters from the show ponies.

Be the star, but feature the message.

{ 0 comments }

Astonishing babies

by R. L. Howser on February 28, 2010 · 0 comments

In several studies, babies as young as five months old have been shown to be able to do simple mathematics. What does this have to do with presentation? More than you might think. The fact that even babies know that one plus one is not three is not all that relevant to our purposes, but the way that they measured the babies’ abilities is.

Dr. Karen Wynn, of the University of Arizona, tested babies by showing each of them a small figurine of Mickey Mouse. After putting the figurine behind a small screen, she showed the baby a second, identical figurine and also put that one behind the screen. When the screen was removed, the researchers tracked the baby’s gaze. If two figurines were revealed from behind the screen, the babies would look at it briefly and then their gaze would move on.

Dr. Wynn found, however, that the babies would look longer at the figurines if the resulting number of them didn’t match the mathematically expected result. Beyond the amazing fact that newborn babies are as good at math as I am, the takeaway for our purposes is that the unexpected result grabbed and held their attention far longer than the expected result had. Several other studies have confirmed the results through similar methods.

It’s so easy to just follow the same old templates or formulas that have worked before, when a fresh approach, a different perspective or an atypical style that breaks from all of the usual expectations might serve you far better. At the very least, it should grab and hold your audience’s attention a bit longer, and that’s half the battle.

{ 0 comments }